A room’s layout isn’t about aesthetics – it can influence how your meetings will be conducted as well as the effectiveness of your people. That’s as to why there are a wide array of meeting area formats, each with its unique strengths and limitations.
The boardroom style is the most prevalent format and works well for agenda-focussed gatherings, video
conferences and collaboration with remote attendees. It features a large table with chairs around this, and can comfortably accommodate two dozen persons at once while still allowing for discussion and note-taking.
Another option is the auditorium style, which usually places a couple of rows of seats before a stage or screen. This allows a lot of individuals to attend at the same time, but it doesn’t encourage two-way knowledge posting and can be problematic with respect to attendees to find the presenter clearly.
An alternative to these types of setups is definitely the hollow square, which comprises of four platforms forming a closed rectangular or rectangle board room center com with an empty space in the middle. This kind of works well for somewhat smaller groups – say twenty or much less – since it allows for easy group connection and a moderator or perhaps facilitator heading between the desks easily to facilitate conversations.
There are also one or two classroom-inspired plans that aren’t suited to interactive instruction, such as the chevron layout, which keeps all of the seating facing ahead but removes the tables. Whilst it can enrich seating ability, the quarter format can make it difficult for attendees to consider notes or perhaps use the devices and may also prohibit line of eyesight.